The episode of “Coast To Coast AM” starts with Art Bell welcoming listeners to a new week of talk radio. Art is excited about the show being aired full-time in Phoenix and announces a special two-hour segment exclusively for Phoenix listeners. He then touches on various topical issues: the state funeral of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis and the nation’s mourning for her, a shootout in an Indianapolis restaurant, and the beginning of a major healthcare reform debate in the U.S. The show moves on to discuss the possibility of Hillary Clinton running for president and the likelihood of Dan Rostenkowski’s indictment. Art also delves into the issue of illegal immigration, highlighting a lack of border control and the government’s potential plans to issue national ID cards as a solution. A caller from Phoenix contributes to the immigration discussion, raising concerns about the implications of such ID cards and the broader debate on national sovereignty and people control. The segment concludes with a debate on whether American patriots and Christians would support the idea of deporting non-citizens, juxtaposed against their fear of a national ID system likened to “the mark of the beast.”
Art continues his discussion with callers about the issue of national identity and immigration. The conversation revolves around whether it would be acceptable to expel people who are not citizens, a topic inspired by a similar movement in England reported on “60 Minutes.” A caller from South Dakota introduces the topic of the Illuminati and theoretical marches, but Art steers the conversation back to practical matters.
The debate shifts to the idea of issuing ID cards to identify citizens, a concept that raises concerns about privacy and control, with one caller likening it to “the mark of the beast.” Despite these concerns, there’s a sense of ambivalence among the callers; they acknowledge the need for some form of identification to address illegal immigration, yet they express apprehension about the potential misuse of such IDs.
Art and the callers also touch on the ridiculousness of not being allowed to ask someone’s citizenship status, with Art expressing frustration over such regulations. The segment ends with a discussion about the impact of talk show hosts on public opinion, specifically mentioning a host who supported Linda Thompson and the notion of an armed march on Washington.
The discussion continues with callers weighing in on Linda Thompson’s proposed armed march on Washington. One caller strongly disagrees with the idea of using guns in the march, fearing it would attract extremists and lead to dangerous consequences. This sentiment is echoed by Art, who emphasizes the risks involved in such actions.
The conversation then shifts to the public’s reaction to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis’s death. A caller compares the Kennedys to the Nixons, noting the media’s fascination with youth, wealth, and beauty, and how these factors contributed to the Kennedys’ iconic status. Art expresses surprise at the level of grief and the scale of the state funeral for Jacqueline Kennedy, akin to that of a president.
The topic of Linda Thompson’s declaration of independence and her approach to protest is revisited with another caller from San Diego. She argues that peaceful demonstrations are ineffective against an indifferent government in Washington. Art, however, warns of the disastrous consequences if Thompson’s armed approach were to be implemented, predicting violence and loss of life.
A caller from California expresses frustration with government actions and the lack of recourse for citizens. She feels a drastic action, like Thompson’s proposed march, might be necessary to bring about change, despite her personal reservations about such extreme measures.
One caller, expressing concern, urges caution, suggesting that while there’s widespread dissatisfaction with the government, radical actions like an armed march could have dire consequences.
The conversation takes a more whimsical turn when Art reads a fax he received, which presents a conspiracy theory involving France, the planet Jupiter, and various historical and cultural references, ranging from the Roswell crash to disco music. This part of the show highlights Art’s willingness to entertain a wide range of ideas and theories, no matter how outlandish they may seem.
The discussion returns to a more serious tone with a caller from Phoenix, who talks about the need for constitutional amendments to address government overreach. The caller suggests that many recent amendments to the Constitution have been detrimental and proposes a method to amend the Constitution, eliminating every amendment after the 10th while preserving beneficial provisions like the prohibition of slavery.
A notable subject is the idea of a national identity card, which the Clinton administration is reportedly considering. This proposal, involving various federal agencies like the U.S. Postal Service and the IRS, is seen by some callers as an intrusion on personal freedom, with one referring to it as “the mark of the beast.”
Art then takes a call from Denise in Wichita, Kansas, who brings up the topic of “knock and talk” warrantless searches, raising concerns about their constitutionality. Denise also mentions a document from the Committee of 1776 calling for a demonstration at state capitols, which could potentially render Linda Thompson’s planned armed march unnecessary if successful. This leads to a discussion about the duty of citizens to uphold the constitution and confront tyranny.
Throughout the conversation, Art and the callers reflect on the current state of civil liberties in the U.S., with concerns about government overreach and the potential for violent conflict. Art emphasizes that any armed confrontation in Washington would likely be met with force by the authorities.
A caller from Phoenix suggests that instead of resorting to such extreme measures, Thompson should consider forming her own political party to bring about change, citing Ross Perot’s missed opportunity to do the same.
Art reflects on the nature of revolutions, cautioning that most revolutions go wrong, often resulting in a dictatorship rather than true democratic change. He emphasizes the importance of the U.S. Constitution, even though it may be “bent and bruised.”
The discussion then shifts to a caller, Marie, who talks about the ongoing political activities of Ross Perot’s supporters. She mentions the group “United We Stand,” which is still active in political discussions and debates. Marie also supports the idea of peaceful demonstrations at state capitols, promoting active but non-violent civic engagement.
Art questions why many are so quick to give up on the U.S. and its constitution, expressing confusion over the readiness of some to take extreme steps. He emphasizes the greatness of the country and its constitution, urging listeners to consider peaceful and lawful means of effecting change.
A caller discusses the legality of Thompson’s proposal. The caller argues it might be constitutional, but Art challenges this view, questioning the legitimacy and jurisdiction of any such action under the U.S. Constitution.
Art then switches to discussing the proposed national ID card, with a caller expressing concern about the potential for racial profiling and the intrusive nature of such a card. Another caller, Charlie from Phoenix, shares his apprehension about a friend planning to join Linda Thompson’s march, highlighting the fear and division such extreme actions can cause.
The conversation shifts to a caller from Santa Barbara who strongly opposes the idea of an armed revolution, arguing that if Americans have to resort to violence, it means the great American experiment has failed. He advocates for peaceful and sensible solutions to problems, rejecting the radical approach proposed by Linda Thompson.
Art Bell points out that the conversation around healthcare is focused on mandates and costs, with concerns about how these will impact Americans’ finances.
A law student named Tony from Sacramento calls in to discuss Linda Thompson’s proposed armed march on Washington. He asserts that there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that allows citizens to take up arms against the government in the manner Thompson suggests. Tony also emphasizes the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution, highlighting the importance of democratic mechanisms and expressing his preference for addressing political disagreements through the ballot rather than violence.
The conversation then shifts to the topic of secondhand smoke. A caller discusses his experience as a smoker and the social stigma he faces. He expresses skepticism about the studies on the harm of secondhand smoke and questions who funds these studies. Art responds by discussing the tobacco companies’ stance on the issue, noting that they are challenging the idea that secondhand smoke is significantly harmful. He suggests that the focus on secondhand smoke is a strategy to pass more restrictive smoking legislation.
The conversation continues with a discussion about government waste, referencing the Grace Commission’s findings from the 1980s, which uncovered frivolous expenditures like the infamous $436 hammer.
A caller draws a parallel to the 1931 Bonus March, where unarmed veterans were harmed during a protest, and speculates about what might have happened if they had been armed. This leads to a broader discussion about the potential consequences of Linda Thompson’s proposed armed march, with Art and the caller agreeing that any armed confrontation would likely end in tragedy.
Another caller quotes the Declaration of Independence, arguing that it gives citizens the right to alter or abolish a government that becomes tyrannical. Art challenges this interpretation, emphasizing that the U.S. does not currently experience absolute despotism, and warns against prematurely calling for radical actions that could destroy what America represents.
The conversation then shifts to a caller from Montana expressing concern about the presence of UN troops and military equipment in the state. She reports sightings of UN-marked tanks and military personnel in various locations in Montana. Art responds with skepticism, noting he has not personally seen such an influx of UN troops.
Art Bell moves on to discuss the political situation in Haiti, criticizing President Clinton’s handling of the crisis. A caller from Reno joins in, outlining the negative impact of the U.S. embargo on Haiti’s economy and the worsening situation for Haitian people. The caller suggests that instead of further embargoes or military intervention, the U.S. should consider arming Haitians to allow them to resolve their own issues.
The conversation also touches on the possibility of the U.S. invading Haiti, with both Art and the caller agreeing that such a move would likely end in disaster. They discuss the logistics and consequences of military intervention, expressing skepticism about the effectiveness of such an approach.
A caller brings up the Declaration of Independence, comparing the tyranny of King George with modern government actions. The conversation revolves around the notion of an absolute government and whether it denies its citizens the right to a trial by jury. The caller suggests that the current U.S. government is exhibiting behaviors akin to those listed as grievances against King George in the Declaration of Independence, specifically regarding the case of Red Beckman and the IRS.
Art challenges the caller by asking if he pays taxes, highlighting the responsibilities that come with enjoying the services provided by the government. The discussion touches on the controversy surrounding the 16th Amendment and the role of the IRS, with Art expressing disapproval of some of their methods but emphasizing the importance of paying taxes.
Another caller from Missoula, Montana, discusses the issue of smoking and the Democratic Party’s stance against it. The caller expresses frustration with environmentalists and the government’s interference in tobacco farming, mentioning the plight of Kentucky farmers shown on “Nightline” who feel they can’t grow anything other than tobacco.
The conversation continues with a discussion about the secondhand smoke issue. Art asserts that if the argument against secondhand smoke gains enough traction, it could eventually lead to smoking becoming illegal in America.
A caller named Conrad from Eugene, Oregon, inquires about the topic of a recent “Dreamland” show, which turns out to be about UFOs. Another caller discusses seeing people talking to themselves, leading to a conversation about internal arguments and mental health.
The topic then shifts to government spending, with a caller questioning the necessity of some expenditures, such as a study on the average length of airline stewardesses’ noses. This leads to a discussion about the challenges faced by a 19-year-old caller trying to get money for college. The caller expresses frustration over racial dynamics and difficulties in obtaining a loan without a job.
Another caller brings up the topic of the Clementine space mission, mentioning something that went wrong with it. Art confirms the issue, adding a sense of intrigue to the conversation.
One caller inquires about an advertisement for Dreamland T-shirts, and Art describes the shirts as beautiful, created with a Tesla coil and designed by artist Dave Archer. Another caller tries to discuss crime and gun ownership but struggles with cellular phone issues.
A listener sends a fax about illegal immigration, suggesting that the influx from the Mexican border will eventually lead to the deterioration of conditions in the United States. The writer also references the NAFTA agreement, questioning its effectiveness in solving the problem of illegal immigration.
Jeremiah from Colorado calls in to clarify his previous discussion with Art about evolution. The conversation becomes a critique of debates where participants talk past each other without truly engaging in substantive dialogue.
Another caller discusses the potential tragedy of armed conflict in the United States, emphasizing that it should be a last resort after all legal and peaceful means have been exhausted. The caller mentions a successful peaceful protest in Florida as an example of effective activism.
One caller discusses the ongoing frustration and anger over the assault weapons ban and the importance of civilly expressing dissent to representatives. The caller encourages people to join organizations like the NRA, even if they have disagreements with the group, due to its influence and resources.
A caller from Portland expresses dissatisfaction with the NRA but acknowledges the need to work within the organization to effect change. Art agrees, emphasizing the importance of trying to influence such organizations from within.
Next, a caller identifying as a libertarian from California introduces the concept of “chaos in moderation” and discusses the relationship between order and chaos. This philosophical conversation touches on the dynamics of control and the unintended consequences of imposing order.
Another caller is concerned about the potential actions of Linda Thompson and her followers, fearing that their extremism could jeopardize the right to bear arms. The caller suggests that the government should intervene to prevent any potential violence, while Art reflects on the political implications of such intervention.
One caller discusses the situation surrounding Linda Thompson and her proposed march to Washington. The caller suggests that the government should attempt to negotiate with Thompson and urges her to call off the march, fearing it could backfire and negatively impact gun ownership rights. Art agrees that any government intervention could potentially martyr Thompson and escalate the situation.
Another caller, identifying as “Doctor Democrat,” discusses U.S.-China relations, particularly the complexities surrounding the renewal of China’s Most Favored Nation (MFN) status. The caller argues for a balanced approach, suggesting that minor sanctions could send a message to China about human rights progress. Art, however, expresses skepticism about China’s human rights record and the effectiveness of such a strategy.
The conversation then shifts to North Korea’s military capabilities and the strategic importance of maintaining good relations with China to address security concerns in the region. The caller praises President Clinton’s foreign policy efforts, citing his achievements in various international crises.
The discussion touches on domestic politics, with a focus on Ted Kennedy’s potential re-election and the public’s perception of the Paula Jones case against President Clinton. The caller shares poll numbers indicating a shift in public opinion favoring Clinton, which Art acknowledges but questions.
A caller from Alaska expresses concern over the nation’s moral decline, which he associates with the election of Bill Clinton. He believes that the political system is failing and foresees a potential revolution, although he does not advocate for it. The caller also mentions high-profile cases like Randy Weaver in Idaho and the Waco siege, suggesting a growing distrust of the government among the public.
Art acknowledges the legitimacy of some of the complaints raised by the callers, despite their seemingly extreme views. He discusses the complexity of government interventions, like the Waco siege and the Randy Weaver case, and the resulting public perceptions.
A self-identified socialist from Kansas City criticizes the discussions about Linda Thompson and gun rights, finding them disconnected from reality. Art disagrees, emphasizing the importance of these discussions, even if some opinions might seem dangerous or misguided.
The conversation then shifts to the Federal Reserve and the economy. A caller questions the Fed’s decision to increase interest rates despite low inflation, and Art explains it as a preventative measure to maintain economic stability.
A caller from Alaska shares his disapproval of certain individuals discussing gun control and revolution, expressing a belief in the political system despite its perceived shortcomings. He feels the nation has lost its moral fiber, particularly with the election of Bill Clinton, and anticipates potential upheaval.
Art discusses the implications of President Clinton’s potential response to the Paula Jones case, focusing on the issue of presidential immunity and whether a sitting president can be sued for actions committed before or during their term.
A different caller expresses disillusionment with the United States and an admiration for the seemingly carefree lifestyle in Mexico. Art counters this by highlighting the corruption and political unrest in Mexico, suggesting that the caller’s perception might be skewed due to a lack of engagement with local politics and news during his visit.
Another caller from Alaska equates some of the show’s previous socialist-leaning callers to individuals who would sacrifice their own interests for a perceived greater good, using a metaphor of feeding themselves to a tiger. This caller also reflects on the state of the nation, suggesting that the U.S. is on the brink of imploding due to various internal issues, including the actions of the Federal Reserve and the Clinton administration.
A caller from Alaska discusses the state of the nation, expressing concern about the decline in the education system and moral values. He suggests that the solution may lie in a higher power, indicating a need for spiritual guidance.
A caller from the Bronx talks about evolution and the possibility of a creator using evolution as a means of creation. This philosophical conversation touches on how science has debunked many old myths and superstitions.
Art humorously suggests that America could decide issues based on polls, playfully proposing a new branch of government run by pollsters. This reflects the increasing reliance on public opinion surveys in political decision-making.
A caller from Fairbanks, Alaska, addresses rumors about foreign military personnel and equipment in the United States, explaining that many international troops come to the U.S. for training. He mentions seeing Canadian military personnel in Alaska and reassures listeners that there’s no cause for alarm regarding foreign military presence.
Another caller, under the influence of pain medication, shares his views on Linda Thompson and her proposed actions. Art listens patiently but expresses concern about the caller’s condition.
A caller from Alaska discusses Linda Thompson’s call to action, expressing disagreement with her extreme approach but acknowledging her right to protest. Art clarifies that while peaceful protest is a right, Thompson’s call for armed action goes beyond what is legally permissible.
Another caller from Palm Springs expresses satisfaction with being able to listen to Dreamland and brings up topics such as an article in Money magazine about crime and the idea of investing in gold for emergencies. The caller also inquires about any new developments with Linda Thompson, to which Art responds that he isn’t aware of any.
A caller from Missoula, Montana, talks about his friend Dave, who earlier expressed a desire to move to Mexico. The caller agrees with Dave to some extent, citing the lower cost of living in Mexico. However, Art points out the challenges of making a living in Mexico and the lower standard of living compared to the United States.
Another caller expresses skepticism about the idea of Hillary Clinton running for president after Bill Clinton’s term, imagining what America under her leadership might look like.
A caller from Reno brings up a news blackout about a tragic event in South Africa involving federal troops and a fire, and another news item about a deadly bacterial infection in England. Art acknowledges that sometimes news stories get dropped for various reasons and suggests using shortwave radio to combat news blackouts.
The conversation also touches on the miniseries “The Stand,” with Art commenting on its quality and the portrayal of a biological menace, which he finds relevant to the current discussion about infectious diseases.
A caller from Missoula, Montana, discusses an article about the United Nations working towards global gun control. Art Bell expresses skepticism about the UN’s ability to implement such a measure, given their limited success in managing smaller conflicts. The caller worries about the potential for increased power of the UN, especially if the U.S. government collaborates with such efforts.
Another caller expresses the belief that if the government were to confiscate guns, most people would comply due to their respect for law and order and concerns about their personal and financial circumstances. Art acknowledges this perspective but also believes that there are enough gun owners who would resist, preventing widespread confiscation.
The conversation also touches on the impact of gun control legislation on gun manufacturers and consumers, with a focus on the scarcity of certain gun parts and ammunition due to increased demand and potential legislative changes.
Art Bell and the callers discuss the effectiveness of the NRA and political figures like Bob Dole in addressing gun rights issues, with some expressing frustration at perceived failures and shifts in stance.
A caller discusses an article in “The Missoulian” about the United Nations working towards global gun control. Art Bell expresses doubt about the UN’s ability to enforce such measures, considering their limited success in smaller conflicts.
Another caller from Bellevue talks about the moon’s effect on people and corrects a previous statement made by Art about a flower company. The conversation also touches on the implications of the new crime bill, particularly regarding the classification of magazines that hold more than ten rounds as weapons.
Art discusses the practicality of using a fax modem for receiving faxes, explaining that he needs immediate hard copies of faxes for his work, making a digital solution less feasible.
A caller from Mesa shares his experience of pawning a handgun and the regulations he faced when trying to retrieve it. This leads to a discussion about the Brady Bill and the complexities involved in gun ownership and retrieval.
A caller from Bakersfield discusses the potential confiscation of certain firearms classified as destructive devices or machine guns. Art clarifies that while this hasn’t happened yet, it’s a concern for many gun owners, especially in light of proposed legislation.
Art addresses a caller’s suggestion about using a fax modem to handle incoming faxes, explaining his need for immediate hard copies and the impracticality of digital storage for his purposes.
A caller from Honolulu shares news about Linda Thompson planning a peaceful march in August as a precursor to the proposed September march. Art finds this approach more agreeable, considering it a positive development.
The conversation shifts to Art’s show, Dreamland, with a caller from Honolulu expressing fascination with the program’s content, particularly discussions about life after death and other spiritual topics.
A caller from Edmonds talks about receiving a letter from Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association, discussing membership renewal and the organization’s stance on various issues. The caller and Art express a wish for LaPierre to appear on the show for broader publicity.
A caller discusses the United Nations’ efforts in global gun control, expressing skepticism about their ability to enforce such measures. Art agrees, noting the UN’s limited success in smaller conflicts and doubting their capability to disarm the world.
Another caller from Alaska reflects on the current crime bill before Congress and suggests that enforcing existing laws more diligently could reduce crime without the need for new legislation. He proposes using excess military bases as prisons for convicted criminals.
A caller from Albany, Georgia, brings up the case of Dan Rostenkowski, suggesting that if he were to resign and admit wrongdoing, he could be pardoned in a manner similar to how Nixon was pardoned. The caller also touches on the issue of political pensions and expresses opinions on how they should be managed.
Art responds to several callers’ concerns about a new disease in Great Britain, reported to be caused by a group A streptococcus, which is usually responsible for strep throat. A caller who works in a medical laboratory provides insights into this health issue.
The caller, who works in a medical laboratory, shares insights about the increasing resistance to penicillin and other antibiotics, likely caused by their overuse. This has led to mutations in bacteria, which could explain the emergence of new and more aggressive strains like the one causing gangrene-like symptoms in Great Britain, as mentioned by earlier callers.
The conversation highlights the growing concern over antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the potential for these pathogens to cause serious health crises. The caller agrees with Art’s earlier comment about humanity potentially ending “not with a bang but a whimper,” referring to the subtle but potentially devastating impact of such diseases.
Art Bell concludes the program by thanking the callers and listeners, promising to gather more information about this health issue and discuss it in future shows.