On the episode of “Coast to Coast AM” hosted by Art Bell from October 18, 2001, Art begins by greeting his listeners from across the world and introducing the night’s special theme. He mentions some important announcements, including welcoming a new affiliate station in Clarksville, Tennessee. He then shifts to a significant topic, discussing Rush Limbaugh’s sudden hearing loss and the medical efforts to address it. Art notes how common hearing loss is in the radio industry, but Limbaugh’s case is more severe, possibly caused by the death of tiny hairs in the ear responsible for transmitting sound.
Art then moves into reflecting on past experiments he led on the show involving mass consciousness and how listeners collectively influenced weather patterns, causing rain to appear where it wasn’t forecasted. He also mentions how these experiments contributed to healing attempts during health crises, such as when his guest, Richard Hoagland, suffered a heart attack, and another individual, Daniel Brinkley, underwent brain surgery.
Art further discusses Princeton University’s experiments with random number generators, which appeared to react to large global events like 9/11. These generators showed spikes during significant moments, suggesting a correlation between mass consciousness and external events. Richard Hoagland, the guest in the next hour, would elaborate on this mysterious phenomenon.
Art continues by explaining the two experiments planned for the evening: the first focused on Rush Limbaugh and the second targeting Princeton University. He mentions Princeton will be monitoring random number generators in real time, aiming to see if they can influence the results, an experiment similar to past ones conducted on the show. Art then shifts to discussing updates on the streaming service for the show, announcing a reduction in the price to $5 per month for a six-month subscription, in response to listener concerns. He acknowledges the resistance some have to paying for previously free content but emphasizes that costs must be met.
Art also shares some personal excitement about the singer Crystal Gayle visiting his home for lunch the next day. He recalls being a longtime fan of hers and shares that he displayed a rare poster of her on his webcam just before the show. He briefly turns to the news, discussing the ongoing anthrax scares following the 9/11 attacks, including two new confirmed cases that day, bringing the national total to six. He reflects on the government’s efforts to reassure the public and the reward offered for capturing those responsible for the anthrax letters.
Art delves deeper into the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan, mentioning recent airstrikes that resulted in civilian casualties. He touches on the broader issues of war and justice, expressing his strong feelings about vengeance against those responsible for acts of terrorism. He acknowledges a sense of contradiction between his personal desire for vengeance and the larger spiritual force he believes they are about to exercise through the experiments on the show.
As the show prepares for the first mass consciousness experiment focused on Rush Limbaugh, Art gives detailed instructions for listeners to concentrate on healing Rush’s hearing. He encourages everyone to visualize white light, a common healing symbol, and imagine the tiny hairs in Rush’s ears regenerating to restore his hearing. Despite acknowledging that many listeners may not agree with Rush’s views, Art appeals to their humanity, asking them to participate in this effort for another person’s well-being. Princeton University will be monitoring the experiment, and Art sets the stage for this collective attempt at influencing reality through concentrated thought.
As Art wraps up the first part of the experiment for Rush Limbaugh’s hearing, he expresses his excitement about Crystal Gayle’s upcoming visit to his home in the Nevada desert. He reiterates his belief in the power of these collective consciousness experiments, despite being a natural skeptic. He admits that past experiments, particularly those involving weather manipulation, scared him due to their unexpected effectiveness. Despite his skepticism, Art firmly believes that this form of mass concentration works, whether it’s attributed to God, the power of the human mind, or both.
A caller from Alabama references a biblical passage from Genesis, where God acknowledges the power of mass concentration during the construction of the Tower of Babel. The caller suggests that this innate human ability, recognized in scripture, might explain why Art’s experiments work. Art finds the connection fascinating, noting that it aligns with the idea of a collective will. He agrees that humans can achieve great things through focused intent but acknowledges the potential dangers, as seen in past experiments where unintended consequences, like floods, resulted from their efforts to change the weather.
Art continues to reflect on the power of mass consciousness, mentioning that past requests to divert natural disasters, such as hurricanes, made him realize the potential risks of tampering with forces they didn’t fully understand. He admits that while healing experiments, like the one for Rush Limbaugh, feel safer to attempt, he stopped experimenting with the weather out of fear that they might unintentionally cause harm.
A caller from Alabama brings up concerns about the anthrax scare and how it might be a diversion by terrorists. Art agrees, noting how effective the terror has been, especially given the media frenzy, even though the number of cases remains low. The conversation shifts to the potential erosion of civil liberties in the name of security, with the caller quoting Thomas Jefferson, reminding listeners of the dangers of sacrificing freedom for security. Art acknowledges that this is a significant risk, though he admits there may not be much choice at the moment.
The caller also suggests a guest for the show, Hal Lindsey, known for his perspectives on international events. Art comments on the broader trend toward global economic and political integration, seeing it as an inevitable process, though not necessarily one to look forward to. He explains that as communication and trade have evolved, the world has become increasingly interconnected, and eventually, borders will likely dissolve, leading to a form of one-world governance. While Art hopes any future global system will be modeled after the freedoms of the United States, he recognizes the concern many feel about losing sovereignty.
Art receives a call from a listener in Arizona who shares his personal experience during the experiment for Rush Limbaugh. The caller, dealing with his own health issues, describes feeling an intense connection during the experiment, even visualizing something inside Rush’s ear that he symbolically destroyed. Art listens but humorously dismisses the more surreal details, focusing instead on the shared goal of helping Rush regain his hearing.
The conversation shifts to the ongoing anthrax scare, with Art urging listeners to avoid panic and maintain perspective. He highlights that although the situation is serious, far more people die from the flu each year, and the media coverage of the anthrax cases has contributed to widespread fear. Art also discusses his decision to stop accepting snail mail due to safety concerns, a necessary precaution given the current climate of bioterrorism.
A new caller from Fort Lauderdale mentions hearing a disturbing news report connecting anthrax to “hoof-and-mouth disease,” a term usually associated with animals. Art clarifies that while anthrax primarily affects animals, humans can contract it, though the connection to hoof-and-mouth disease is not typically made.
Art guides listeners into the second phase of the healing experiment for Rush Limbaugh, asking them to visualize Rush and his ears, sending white healing light or offering prayers for his recovery. Following this, Art introduces the second experiment of the night, which focuses on the work being conducted at Princeton University. He explains that Princeton is monitoring their mass consciousness experiment in real time, with the goal of driving measurable results in their research.
As the show moves forward, Art introduces Richard C. Hoagland, a former NASA advisor, who begins to discuss the extraordinary scientific implications of the Princeton experiment. Hoagland points out that what was once considered a metaphor—people being linked through a “vast electronic family”—may actually have scientific evidence supporting it. He mentions the Global Consciousness Project at Princeton, which has been investigating the effects of mass human consciousness on random number generators, suggesting that the project could substantiate phenomena that have long been explored on Art’s show.
Richard C. Hoagland continues explaining the background of Princeton’s Global Consciousness Project. He mentions key figures like Roger Nelson and Dean Radin, who spearheaded the research. Their efforts, inspired by the ideas of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, sought to measure the existence of a “global mind” using advancing technology like the internet and microprocessors. Nelson’s earlier project, called PEAR (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research), was a precursor to this work and involved experiments with random number generators (RNGs).
Art and Hoagland discuss how RNGs can be influenced by human consciousness, with Art sharing his personal experience using software to manipulate random images. He found that by focusing his mind, he could dramatically affect the RNG’s output, achieving consistent results that dropped when he was not present or actively thinking about the task. The goal of the Global Consciousness Project was to scale these experiments and see if a global awareness or collective mind could influence RNGs in a measurable way, offering scientific validation for the concept of global interconnectedness.
Richard Hoagland continues explaining the development of the Global Consciousness Project, mentioning that they used portable random number generators (RNGs), referred to as “eggs.” These devices were distributed around the world and linked via the internet to measure potential changes in randomness during significant global events. Hoagland compares the project’s concept to a seismograph, which detects changes in the earth’s activity; similarly, the RNGs were designed to sense changes in global consciousness.
The project began its experiments around the time of Princess Diana’s death in 1997, where they observed a measurable effect, with only a one-in-a-hundred chance that the results were random. The project continued monitoring major world events, including 9/11, during which the RNGs showed spikes even before the first plane hit the World Trade Center. The researchers found that some global events produced significant effects, while others did not, leading to speculation that factors beyond mere collective attention might be at play.
Hoagland reveals that Princeton’s researchers were aware of the healing experiment for Rush Limbaugh and were actively monitoring the RNGs for any anomalies during the broadcast.
Art and Richard Hoagland discuss how to direct listeners’ focus for the next experiment aimed at influencing the random number generators (RNGs) at Princeton. Richard suggests visualizing Princeton’s campus and picturing something non-random, like the number five, to concentrate on. Art refines the suggestion, asking listeners to picture white noise on a television screen and gradually transform it into a solid color, such as black or red. This shift from randomness (white noise) to non-randomness (a solid color) symbolizes what they are attempting to achieve with the RNGs.
As they head into the next break, Art instructs listeners to focus on turning the randomness into a single, solid color, believing this concentrated effort will affect the RNGs being monitored at Princeton.
Art and Richard continue discussing the method for focusing listeners’ concentration in the ongoing experiment, with the goal of influencing randomness at Princeton. Art suggests that visualizing white noise as complete randomness, and then mentally driving it away to create a solid color, represents the fight against entropy. Richard agrees, explaining that when minds are linked, the RNGs display less entropy and more coherence, which is the desired outcome.
They reflect on the potential for these experiments to connect to deeper physical processes beyond just mental linkage. Richard brings up the idea that these RNGs might be measuring changes in the fundamental constants of reality. He suggests that moments like the 9/11 attacks might open windows where communication between minds is easier, akin to the concept of “nonlocality” in quantum mechanics.
They also touch on quantum entanglement, where particles remain connected despite being separated. Art recalls a physicist from Princeton who was skeptical of psi abilities, but Richard counters that the data from the Global Consciousness Project is too substantial to dismiss, reinforcing the credibility of their experiments.
Art and Richard continue their discussion about the impact of collective consciousness and its potential links to higher forces, such as God. Richard suggests that while traditional depictions of God might not directly explain these phenomena, a broader concept of consciousness or a “mind of God” might be at play. He touches on the inherent power of conscious minds and their ability to influence reality, noting that this capability may extend beyond our typical three-dimensional existence.
Art compares the effects of collective concentration to the power of prayer, referencing studies where individuals who were prayed for had better recovery rates. Richard agrees that the Global Consciousness Project at Princeton is essentially a large-scale experiment on this idea—registering coherence and resonance among many minds focused on the same goal.
Richard then shares his thoughts on George W. Bush’s transformation following the events of 9/11, noting how many initially doubted his leadership capabilities. However, he believes that the immense collective focus of millions of people, all wishing for the best outcome, may have helped Bush rise to the occasion. This widespread positive resonance, Richard suggests, lifted Bush and allowed him to develop into the leader required during that difficult time.
Richard and Art continue discussing the nature of the power behind mass consciousness, with Richard proposing that this power is inherently positive and tied to concepts like Norman Vincent Peale’s “positive thinking.” Art, however, disagrees slightly, stating that while he doesn’t advocate using it negatively, he believes this power can be wielded for either good or bad, depending on the intention. He brings up examples, such as Hitler’s attempt to harness occult practices for negative purposes, suggesting that concentrated efforts could indeed be used to harm, but he personally would not explore such paths.
Richard agrees that negative forces could attempt to use this power but emphasizes that their efforts are typically based on specific timing, such as aligning their actions with celestial events to maximize the impact. This leads Richard to compare these manipulations to what they are doing in their positive experiments, which aim to influence outcomes through collective positive focus. He also refers to previous moments in history where mass consciousness may have influenced world leaders, such as Lincoln or George W. Bush, during critical times of crisis.
Art then guides the listeners into the second part of the night’s experiment, instructing them to focus on turning the random noise on a television screen into a solid color, representing non-randomness. He urges them to concentrate this visualization over Princeton, hoping to once again affect the RNGs being monitored in real time.
Art and Richard conclude the experiments for the night, acknowledging that the results will take about 48 hours to analyze. Richard mentions that Princeton’s research department, known as PEAR (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research), has been doing independent work and has asked for help solving a specific problem. While Richard hints that he has some insights related to this issue, he holds back from revealing too much, stating that he will share his findings with Princeton first.
They delve into discussions about celestial alignments and hyperdimensional physics (HD physics), with Richard explaining that certain geometric configurations within the solar system can open “doorways” between dimensions. These alignments are cyclical, occurring over various timeframes, from months to centuries. Art interrupts to mention a recent conversation where someone told him that Zecharia Sitchin’s theories—particularly about a celestial body—might be proven correct. Richard responds that if a massive object periodically moves through the solar system, it could fit within the framework of HD physics, reinforcing the idea of recurring geometric patterns influencing cosmic and human events.
Richard explains how the data from Princeton’s Global Consciousness Project has provided real evidence for their theories, showing how specific cosmic alignments and windows might influence reality. He emphasizes that these alignments, once thought of as symbolic, now have measurable effects, with Princeton’s research proving it through experiments. Richard discusses how their data correlates with specific world events, like the 9/11 attacks, showing measurable increases in non-randomness hours before the event.
Art and Richard explore how these “windows” may have been used negatively, such as by groups like the historical “Order of Assassins” and potentially by modern terrorists like Osama bin Laden. They suggest that these negative actions, planned for specific celestial alignments, aim to bend reality and manipulate the future. Art and Richard agree that this same power, rooted in free will, can be used either positively or negatively, but it’s often easier to harness it for positive outcomes due to the nature of collective human intent.
Art encourages listeners to explore this further by visiting his website to view the charts and data from Princeton, which visually demonstrate the spikes in non-randomness leading up to major events like 9/11.
Richard delves deeper into the idea of the power behind mass consciousness and how understanding it could allow for better prevention of its negative uses. He explains that while this power can function at any time, it becomes much more effective during certain cosmic windows, which align with the fundamental physics of the universe. This insight, he suggests, could help the “good guys” prevent the “bad guys” from using it again, as seen in events like 9/11.
He shares that people within the government have taken an interest in their research, exploring its potential as a predictive tool. Richard emphasizes that the knowledge of this power is not new and may have been preserved and guarded by ancient organizations, such as the Templars. He speculates that this ancient knowledge might have been protected as a sacred secret, possibly even linked to Atlantis-type information. Art echoes this sentiment, noting that such power might be hidden in ancient documents.
In a surprising revelation, Richard mentions that there is current exploration happening off the coast of Cuba, where a submerged structure half a mile beneath the ocean’s surface has caught the attention of experts. Early estimates suggest that it may be up to 50,000 years old. Richard and Art ponder how such a structure could have ended up so deep, given that even during the last ice age, ocean levels would not account for such depth.
Art and Richard continue discussing the potential significance of the submerged structure off the coast of Cuba, with Richard hinting at theories regarding how it might have ended up so deep beneath the ocean’s surface. Art directs listeners to visit his website to see the data and graphs from Princeton’s Global Consciousness Project, showing how human consciousness spiked before and after the 9/11 attacks. Art emphasizes that this chart represents the collective consciousness of humanity, comparing its power to that of the hydrogen bomb.
They reflect on how this power could be measured and validated through data, with Richard reiterating that events like 9/11 were timed to align with specific celestial windows to maximize their impact. The conversation turns to the anthrax scare, with Art pointing out how relatively few people have been affected by anthrax compared to other causes of death, yet it has generated a significant psychological and media response.
Richard brings up the topic of nanotechnology, specifically research from the University of Michigan, and hints at the potential implications of nanobiological technology, which may be linked to future breakthroughs. He mentions that a close associate of his is connected to Tommy Thompson, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, indicating that the research could have significant relevance to ongoing health and security concerns.
Richard continues discussing the “nanobomb” technology developed by Dr. Baker at the University of Michigan, which is designed to target and destroy harmful microorganisms, including viruses and bacteria like anthrax, without harming human cells. He describes how this breakthrough could potentially be a cost-effective and powerful solution for biological threats. Despite its promise, the technology has yet to pass FDA trials, which is a significant barrier to widespread use.
Richard encourages listeners to take action by contacting Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson, urging him to accelerate FDA approval for this treatment. He provides Thompson’s office fax number and suggests also sending copies of the request to prominent media figures, like Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw, and Bill O’Reilly, who have been directly affected by the anthrax attacks. Richard emphasizes the need for public pressure to ensure this potentially life-saving technology receives the attention it deserves.
Richard and Art continue discussing the importance of spreading awareness about the nanobomb technology and how it could be a game-changer in combating bioterrorism. Richard suggests that media outlets like CNN and the Today Show should investigate and bring more attention to this breakthrough. The technology works mechanically rather than genetically, which makes it effective against a wide range of microorganisms without the limitations of molecular targeting.
They reflect on how the media has been a target of recent attacks, such as the anthrax scares, and how this creates fear, which they both agree is one of the most potent weapons used by terrorists. Richard emphasizes that public fear must be mitigated and suggests that if enough people rally behind ideas like pushing for the nanobomb’s approval, real change could be achieved. He stresses that the current situation is not hopeless and that people can take proactive steps, like contacting government officials and media outlets.
Art agrees, pointing out how leveraging the media has been a critical strategy for terrorists, aiming to spread panic. He urges listeners to take action by visiting his website to access the fax numbers and email addresses for key figures, including politicians and media personalities, to demand that the nanobomb be prioritized for approval. Both Art and Richard agree that the media’s role in amplifying these issues is critical but must be balanced to avoid unnecessary fear.
Richard and Art continue emphasizing the importance of acting on the nanobomb technology, explaining how it could be distributed to effectively address bioterrorism threats. They stress that this technology is already available and just needs political action to push it through the remaining stages of testing and approval.
Art then transitions to another major topic: the sudden resignation of Dan Goldin, the long-serving NASA administrator. Normally, this would be headline news, but given the overwhelming events happening in the world, the story was somewhat buried. Art mentions that it’s a significant development, and Richard agrees, noting that Goldin’s departure is a big deal, especially since he served under three U.S. presidents.
Art and Richard discuss the sudden resignation of NASA Administrator Dan Goldin, noting how surprising it was, given that there was no prior indication or a named replacement. Richard speculates that the resignation may be linked to a high-level policy disagreement with the White House, possibly connected to upcoming developments with the Mars Odyssey mission. He explains that Mars Odyssey, which was about to enter Mars orbit, has the instruments necessary to potentially confirm some of the more extraordinary theories about Mars, such as the existence of water and even life.
Richard recalls a paper they published about Mars being a former satellite of a larger planet and how Mars Odyssey could help prove some of their predictions, provided NASA releases the data transparently. He notes that the timing of Goldin’s resignation, just before Mars Odyssey’s arrival at Mars, seems suspicious. Art adds that if Mars Odyssey were to reveal something groundbreaking, like evidence of life or water on Mars, it could even overshadow the current media focus on terrorism.
Richard reflects on President George H.W. Bush’s 1989 Moon-Mars initiative, a bold proposal that NASA and Congress subsequently undermined. Richard suggests that this history of opposition to space exploration might be part of the larger backdrop behind Goldin’s departure.
Art and Richard discuss further possibilities related to the Mars Odyssey mission, with Richard focusing on the significance of the gamma-ray spectrometer (GRS) on board. This instrument is designed to detect gamma rays emitted from the surface of Mars, which can reveal the presence of water just below the surface, either in the form of ice or liquid. Richard explains that this technology could map water locations within a few inches of the surface, and this discovery would be groundbreaking if confirmed.
They also talk about the potential for the mission to detect chlorophyll, which would indicate the presence of plant life. If chlorophyll were found, it would challenge existing models of Mars and suggest the existence of significant vegetation, further reinforcing some of Arthur C. Clarke’s speculations. Richard emphasizes that such a discovery would be revolutionary, providing evidence of life on Mars that scientists have long speculated about.
Richard explains the potential of Mars Odyssey’s advanced multispectral camera, which can distinguish between different materials, even through Martian dust, to identify metal surfaces from rocks. He speculates that if the mission detects chlorophyll, water, or metal, it would drastically change the landscape of space exploration and likely lead to an immediate manned mission to Mars. He ties Dan Goldin’s sudden resignation to the possibility that significant discoveries might be forthcoming, suggesting that NASA may reveal something groundbreaking about Mars.
Art and Richard discuss the broader geopolitical situation, touching on how U.S. funding of groups like the Mujahideen during the Cold War led to unintended consequences, such as the rise of figures like Osama bin Laden. Richard suggests that the current administration is taking a more aggressive and serious approach to tackling terrorism. He also emphasizes the need to change global policy from profiting off conflict to rebuilding war-torn regions like Afghanistan. Art remains hopeful that this shift in approach will lead to positive changes.
Art opens the lines for calls from listeners. The first caller from San Francisco suggests that block faulting—a geological phenomenon where large land blocks shift, either rising or falling—could explain the submerged city off Cuba that they had previously discussed. Richard agrees, explaining that such an event could account for a city being submerged quickly due to a significant geological shift.
Richard then touches on the idea of Atlantis, stating that ancient knowledge, such as that preserved by the Templars, might have survived through global catastrophes. He reiterates the belief that civilization and consciousness rise and fall in cycles, much like what they speculate about Mars. Art adds that the world seems to be moving faster, reflecting on the concept of “the quickening,” which he has often spoken about—a belief that events are accelerating, pushing humanity toward significant changes.
Another caller from North Carolina asks about the significance of 9/11 being a Coptic New Year, which Richard had mentioned on his website. The caller also inquires about how collective consciousness could be harnessed to prevent further fear. Richard emphasizes that fear is the real enemy, not bin Laden or anthrax, and if Americans succumb to fear, the terrorists win. He praises the resilience of people like Dan Rather, who looked beyond the immediate threats to focus on the broader issue of overcoming fear.
The conversation continues with a focus on the power of collective consciousness and how positive energy can be used to counteract negative forces. Richard emphasizes that while some may dismiss these ideas as “new age mumbo jumbo,” data from Princeton’s experiments validates the power of mass consciousness. A caller raises concerns about global issues, such as U.S. relations with China and the larger geopolitical landscape. Richard points out that President Bush’s visit to China in the midst of the current crisis is not accidental but part of a larger global strategy.
Another caller from Seattle suggests that the country needs bold ideas, like a crash program to convert the U.S. economy to hydrogen energy, which would reduce dependence on Middle Eastern oil and diminish the influence of groups like the oil lobby. Richard agrees and mentions other cutting-edge technologies, including electrogravitics, which could transform energy and physics as we know them. He references a company in Huntsville, Alabama, that has developed a technology that defies conventional physics by making objects hover, and he promises to share more details with Art.
The caller introduces the topic of “Earth Dance,” a global event for world peace that occurred on October 13, with synchronized prayers for peace across 120 cities. Art acknowledges the effort but points out that the bombing of Afghanistan continued through that time, which raises questions about the effectiveness of such events. Richard agrees that while the goal is noble, global consciousness events need to align with specific hyperdimensional windows to be more effective. He mentions that the Princeton data from the night’s experiment will provide insights into the results of their own consciousness experiments, which will be shared in the coming days.
Another caller brings up the Brookings Report, a 30-year-old document suggesting that humanity might struggle to cope with knowledge that challenges long-held beliefs. Richard agrees, noting that religious fundamentalism might react negatively to such advances. Both Richard and Art comment on how the media’s sensational coverage has affected the psyche of the American people, particularly in the wake of 9/11 and the subsequent anthrax scare. They suggest that these events have been part of a broader strategy to instill fear and manipulate the public’s perception, with Richard emphasizing the importance of resisting this “psychoterror.”
As the episode of “Coast to Coast AM” draws to a close, Art and Richard reflect on the conversations and experiments of the night. A caller emphasizes the importance of taking action, like contacting Tommy Thompson about the nanobomb technology, while expressing concern that some knowledge might be too overwhelming for society to handle, referencing the Brookings Report. Richard acknowledges the point but distinguishes between the trauma of watching live events like 9/11 and the academic revelation that we might not be alone in the universe.
Art wraps up by expressing gratitude for Richard’s presence and excitement about the results of the night’s experiments. He notes that these discussions could go down in history and looks forward to seeing what the data reveals. Art ends the broadcast on a lighter note, mentioning that he’ll be having lunch with Crystal Gayle the next day.