Art begins by focusing on the ongoing conflict in Bosnia, particularly the meeting in London and NATO’s involvement. Art expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of NATO’s threats against the Serbs, noting the apparent disagreement between the U.S. and Russia on the approach to airstrikes. He questions the potential impact of these threats and whether they would deter the Serbs, especially given the history of unfulfilled warnings. He also touches upon a tragic crime in California, where a gun store owner was brutally murdered during a robbery, leading to a discussion about the aftermath for the victim’s family and the legal consequences for the perpetrators.
Art discusses a legal case in California involving a widow suing the parents of the juveniles responsible for her husband’s death. He delves into the moral and legal implications of holding parents accountable for their children’s actions, especially in cases of serious crimes. This leads to a broader conversation about a bill in California that might make parents financially liable for their children’s misdeeds.
Art then shifts focus to the topic of affirmative action, sparked by the University of California Board of Regents’ decision to end race and gender preferences in admissions. This decision has stirred significant debate, with Jesse Jackson criticizing the move as detrimental to America’s education system. Art questions the effectiveness of affirmative action, suggesting it inherently involves racial quotas and preferences, and invites listeners to consider whether such policies truly promote equality.
The segment also touches on the Waco siege trial, highlighting former Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen’s testimony about poor coordination during the incident. Art expresses skepticism about Bentsen’s claim of being uninformed about the raid, drawing parallels with George Bush’s minimal acknowledgment of the Iran-Contra affair.
Art reports on allegations of rape and drug use at a Baptist picnic, an event involving the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. He concludes with a brief analysis of media coverage of the Waco hearings, suggesting a bias in favor of the ATF and the government.
Art begins by discusses the role of working women in family income, noting that 55% of them contribute half or more to their household’s earnings. However, he points out the persisting wage gap, using psychology as an example where women earn significantly less than men. This leads to a discussion about why women earn $0.76 to every dollar men make, inviting listener opinions.
Art then shifts to a lighter topic, addressing a report on the lack of adequate bathroom facilities for women at public events. He humorously recounts stories of women using men’s restrooms due to long lines at women’s facilities, pondering the social implications of this issue.
Next, Art returns to a more serious topic, discussing the case of Susan Smith, who infamously murdered her children. He details her actions leading up to the tragedy and the argument that her motive was suicide. Art debates the nature of her crime, pondering whether it was a crime of passion and its implications for her mental state and legal responsibility.
Art addresses a listener’s concern about racial descriptions in crime reporting, defending his mention of race in a previous crime story as factual rather than racist. He concludes the segment with a weather update, discussing unusual tornado and thunderstorm activities in the Twin Cities area, and mentioning the impact of these conditions on the show’s network coverage.
Art continues discussing the unusual weather patterns, expressing concern about the quiet seismic activity in Northern California and unusual storms in Wisconsin. He notes the technical difficulties caused by heavy rain impacting satellite signals, reinforcing his belief that something is amiss with the weather.
Art then takes calls from listeners. The first caller from Wisconsin disagrees with the notion that the recent weather is unusual, despite accounts from pilots and others. Another caller discusses a segment on “20/20” about aid provided to Mexicans crossing the border into the United States. Art acknowledges this as an ongoing issue, highlighting the high percentage of births to illegal aliens in L.A. County hospitals and the implications for U.S. citizenship and family immigration.
The discussion shifts to a listener’s strong reaction to the earlier crime story about the murder of a gun store owner. The caller suggests harsh penalties for the perpetrators’ families, reflecting the intense emotions surrounding such crimes. Another caller brings up the Jeffrey Dahmer case, questioning the relevance of Dahmer’s racial motivations given the gravity of his crimes.
A caller from San Diego discusses her experiences with earthquakes in Alaska. She relates this to Art’s concerns about seismic inactivity in Northern California, speculating about the potential for a significant earthquake due to the lack of smaller quakes that typically relieve geological strain. Art agrees that there’s a sense of something impending in nature.
The conversation then shifts to the O.J. Simpson trial, where Art reports that Simpson’s defense team is preparing to conclude their case. He reveals an interesting strategy by Simpson’s lawyers: they have hired a female attorney to mimic prosecutor Marcia Clark in a mock cross-examination of Simpson. Art humorously speculates about the advertisement for such a role, emphasizing the unique qualities needed to emulate Clark’s style.
Art also shares a personal anecdote about a bothersome fly while trying to sleep during the day, illustrating the frustrating yet trivial problems one can encounter in daily life. This lighter story provides a moment of levity amidst the more serious topics of the show.
A caller discusses the commercial aspects of the UFO community. They debate the intentions of those who claim authority in UFO matters, noting the prevalence of merchandise and services for sale. This leads to a broader discussion about the motivations of people in the UFO community, with Art suggesting that even guests on radio shows often have something to sell, such as books.
Art continues his discussion with a caller about the authenticity of photographs depicting an alleged alien abduction. The caller expresses skepticism due to the advances in technology that make creating convincing forgeries possible. Art, however, reveals that many people believe the photographs are real, and he personally leans towards their authenticity, based on their origin from 16-millimeter film dated back to the 1940s.
Art also shares his efforts in enhancing these photographs to bring out more details, mentioning that they will be published in the show’s newsletter prior to their national release. This discussion highlights Art’s interest and involvement in topics related to extraterrestrial life and UFO phenomena.
The conversation shifts to societal issues when Art reads a letter from a listener named Cathy. She discusses the perception of women in society, noting that women are often expected to be content with lower pay and their contributions to the household are geared towards supporting a lifestyle that goes beyond basic survival. This brings up broader points about gender roles and societal expectations.
Additionally, Art touches upon the controversial topic of the ATF’s alleged involvement in activities like racism, rape, and drug use at a picnic, reflecting the variety of subjects covered on the show.
A humorous caller expresses concern about women using men’s bathrooms, tying back to an earlier discussion on the show about the lack of adequate bathroom facilities for women at public events.
Art delves into various topics, starting with a discussion about the responsibility and accountability of parents for their children’s actions. This stems from a story of two young individuals involved in a fatal robbery, and a widow’s lawsuit against their families. Art questions whether parents should be held accountable for their children’s crimes, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
The conversation shifts to a biblical perspective with a caller referencing the Book of Revelation in the context of current global events, including unusual weather patterns. Art reads a fax from a listener discussing increased meteorological phenomena as indicators of significant climate changes. He notes the growing severity of weather conditions, suggesting that this could be part of a broader “quickening” of global changes.
Art also addresses the role of the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) in dealing with threats posed by individuals like Randy Weaver and David Koresh, comparing it to their lack of action against urban gangs. This leads to a broader critique of the ATF’s priorities and effectiveness.
The segment touches upon the curious social behavior of women using restrooms in pairs. Art reads a listener’s comment about this phenomenon, humorously speculating on the reasons behind it, such as the need for companionship or extended time spent in front of mirrors. He invites female listeners to call in and provide their insights into this behavior.
Art continues the lively and varied discussion with his audience. He returns to the topic of women’s bathroom lines, pondering why women tend to visit restrooms in pairs and the societal implications of this behavior. This light-hearted topic contrasts with the more serious subjects covered in the show, providing a balance of content.
The conversation shifts to the O.J. Simpson trial, with a caller from Houston sharing his views on the trial’s developments and expressing his belief in Simpson’s guilt. They discuss the proposal by Governor Pete Wilson to change the jury verdict requirement to 10 out of 12 votes for a conviction, reflecting on the potential impact of such a law.
Art also voices his opinions on political figures, particularly his skepticism about Pete Wilson, whom he views as a “bandwagon jumper.” He expresses a lack of excitement about the upcoming presidential election and his desire to interview President Clinton, anticipating the challenging questions he would pose.
Art humorously comments on a listener’s suggestion for architects to address the long-standing issue of inadequate restroom facilities for women at public events, hinting at possible “invasions” from women seeking equal access.
Art Bell addresses the issue of race in the context of a crime story, emphasizing that the focus should be on the crime itself rather than the race of the perpetrators. Art discusses the financial responsibility of the families of the criminals in compensating the widow of the victim, pondering the broader implications of such legal actions.
The conversation then shifts to the topic of earthquakes, with a caller sharing their experience in Japan and noting the behavior of animals, like dogs, who seem to sense earthquakes before they occur. This leads to a discussion about the potential for predicting such natural disasters.
Art also talks about UFOs and alien photographs, mentioning a pathologist’s analysis of the Roswell images. He details the pathologist’s observations about the anatomy of the alleged alien, suggesting that it appears non-human but anatomically plausible. This discussion highlights the show’s interest in paranormal and extraterrestrial topics.
Art discusses the upcoming release of more photographs related to the Roswell incident on the internet, hinting at the growing interest and involvement of the media and government officials in the story.
The conversation then shifts to a call from Marianne in Portland, who suggests opening the “alien line” for discussions about extraterrestrial life. She also shares a prophecy from a Serbian shepherd, adding a historical and cultural dimension to the show’s usual topics.
Art discusses the work of Dr. Bruce Goldberg, praising him for his customer service and the intriguing nature of his work in past and future lives. This leads to a philosophical musing on whether life is preordained or if free will truly exists.
The topic of affirmative action is also touched upon. A caller inquires about the definition and implications of affirmative action, leading to a discussion about preferences and quotas based on sex or race in employment and institutional settings.
Art responds to a caller who shares appreciation for products promoted on the show, highlighting the show’s influence on its listeners. The caller also humorously blames Art for his newfound interest in scanners, which he finds more entertaining than the show.
The conversation then shifts to a discussion about the potential impact of proposed legal changes in California, particularly in the context of jury verdicts and the O.J. Simpson trial. A caller from Reno questions whether these changes, if passed, could be applied retroactively, leading to a broader discussion on the political maneuvering of Governor Pete Wilson. Art and the caller speculate about Wilson’s potential as a vice-presidential candidate and the importance of California in the upcoming presidential election.
The topic of scanners resurfaces, with Art acknowledging their allure and the reality they reveal about local communities. He warns, however, that being aware of all the local crimes reported on scanners might be unsettling for some people.
the show revisits the ongoing discussion about women’s bathroom habits, particularly the time spent in restrooms and the tendency to go in pairs. Art humorously suggests a study to determine if the presence of mirrors affects the time spent in restrooms, and a caller from San Francisco offers a practical perspective on why women might take longer than men.
Art addresses a caller’s concern about the lack of courtesy and respect towards public figures, specifically the President. They discuss the tendency to refer to the President by first name or derogatory nicknames, leading to a broader conversation about respect for the office, regardless of personal opinions about the incumbent. Art recalls how both conservative and liberal presidents have been subjected to disrespect, highlighting the bipartisan nature of the issue.
The conversation shifts to a lighter topic when a caller from Tuscaloosa, Alabama, inquires about the progress of Art’s boat. Art reveals that the boat is being designed by a commercial artist and discusses the potential for the boat’s design to be used on the cover of his book. This leads to a humorous exchange about Art’s love for cats, with the caller sharing his own experiences with pets.
Art also discusses the content of his upcoming book, hinting at holding back some of the best material for the publication.
A caller from Presque Isle, Maine, inquires about a book on alien abduction and UFOs from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Art notes that he hasn’t heard of it but expresses interest in potentially featuring the author on his show. The caller also mentions that the weather in Maine has been unusually dry, contributing to the ongoing discussions about abnormal weather patterns.
The conversation shifts to the growth and reach of “Coast to Coast AM.” A caller remarks on the show’s expanding audience, and Art reflects on the evolution of the show from its origins as “West Coast AM” to its current widespread syndication. He expresses a mix of pride and nervousness about the show’s success.
A caller from Illinois brings up political topics, specifically criticizing President Clinton’s approach to federal law enforcement and the ongoing FBI scandal. The discussion touches on concerns about government accountability and the upcoming presidential election, with the caller expressing skepticism about both the Democratic and Republican candidates.
In a lighter vein, a caller from Washington addresses Art’s previous question about why women often go to the restroom in pairs. She explains that it’s a safety precaution, adding a practical perspective to the humorous debate.
A female caller discusses why women often go to the restroom in pairs, suggesting it is for safety reasons. Art, however, remains skeptical, believing there is a social aspect to this behavior, especially at events where safety is less of a concern.
A caller from Medford, Oregon, joins the conversation, commenting on the beautiful weather in the region and the spectacular lightning storms. He then shifts the discussion to the Waco incident, expressing frustration with the polarization and bickering surrounding the event. The caller also inquires about the significance of a gold or yellow-fringed American flag, to which Art responds that it is an admiralty flag and nothing unusual.
Art shares his passion for radio and talks about writing a book that will include behind-the-scenes stories from his career. He hints at revealing a lot in this book, jokingly suggesting it might be safer if he were not around after its publication.
The discussion then turns to the topic of affirmative action, with a caller suggesting that recent polls show a majority of Americans support amending rather than ending affirmative action programs. The conversation delves into the complexities of implementing affirmative action without resorting to quotas or preferences, highlighting the challenges in addressing racial and social inequalities.
A caller from Maine discusses a book on alien abductions and UFOs, sparking Art’s interest in possibly featuring the author on the show. The caller also notes the unusual dry weather in Maine, contributing to the ongoing conversation about abnormal weather patterns.
The discussion then turns to politics, with callers expressing their views on affirmative action and the political strategies of President Clinton and the Republican Party. One caller criticizes the polarization in politics and the use of a surprise witness in the Waco hearings, while another highlights the strategic shift of Clinton towards the political center.
Art humorously addresses a caller who questions his decision to include photographs in his upcoming book, suggesting it should be thick with lots of pictures. Another caller brings up a unique observation about the distinctiveness of voices, likening them to fingerprints, leading to a discussion about recognizing individuals by their voice.
The segment takes a lighter turn with a caller who jokingly suspects Art of being the Antichrist because of his receding hairline. Art responds with humor, dismissing the notion and playing along with the joke.
A caller from Maine introduces the idea of electromagnetic weather control, humorously suggesting that Art has a knob to control the weather. Art plays along, joking about his ability to create thunderstorms and predict tornadoes. This lighthearted exchange reflects the show’s capacity to blend humor with discussions about unconventional theories.
The topic then shifts back to the ongoing debate about why women go to the restroom in pairs. A caller from Billings, Montana, admits she doesn’t follow this practice but acknowledges that it’s common among other women. Art speculates that this behavior might be due to social interaction rather than safety.
A critical fax about the ATF’s handling of the Waco incident is read, highlighting the show’s openness to various viewpoints and its engagement with controversial topics. Art’s response to the fax showcases his ability to address serious issues with a blend of sincerity and humor.
A caller from Sioux Falls, South Dakota, contributes to the restroom discussion by pointing out the practical difficulties women face with public restroom facilities, like dealing with toilet paper dispensers. She also agrees that social interaction is a key reason why women might go to the restroom together.
Art humorously discusses the consequences of men entering women’s restrooms, contrasting it with women entering men’s restrooms, and highlights the double standards in societal norms.
The discussion begins with a caller’s humorous suggestion that women go to restrooms in pairs as a way to make men’s lives more miserable. Art doesn’t buy this theory, instead speculating there must be a deeper, unspoken sociological reason behind this behavior. He observes that no woman has yet called in to reveal the true reason, highlighting the mystery surrounding this common social practice.
A caller from Tokyo informs Art about new close-up photos related to the Roswell UFO incident, which are being analyzed for authenticity. Art discusses the challenges of analyzing such photos, especially when they become distorted at extreme close-ups.
The conversation then shifts to a discussion about the efficacy and rationale of electromagnetic weather control. Art humorously claims to have a control knob for manipulating the weather, demonstrating the show’s penchant for blending humor with discussions on unconventional theories.
Art also addresses a critical fax accusing him of racism in a previous segment. He clarifies his stance, emphasizing that the race of the perpetrators was not the main point of discussion, but rather the legal and ethical implications of suing the parents of criminals.
Art Bell discusses with a caller the reasons why women might take longer in restrooms, focusing on the sociological aspects. A caller suggests that women use restroom visits as an opportunity for social interaction, particularly to talk about men. Art agrees, believing that much of the delay is due to socializing rather than practical issues. He contrasts this with men’s restroom behavior, which he describes as more straightforward and less social.
A libertarian caller brings up the famous profile of Franklin D. Roosevelt and imagines another caller, Doc Democrat, having a related tattoo. The discussion then shifts to the FBI’s handling of the Good Old Boy Roundup, with speculation about how the investigation will be reported and concerns about double standards and the presence of guns at the event.
The topic changes to the relationship between the government and mainstream media, particularly in the context of the Waco and Whitewater hearings. Art criticizes the media’s coverage, suggesting it serves the interests of the government rather than seeking the truth.
Art addresses criticisms he received for driving a Geo Metro, defending his choice and discussing the broader issue of the U.S.’s foreign trade deficit and petroleum imports.
The discussion includes a caller who argues that the main issue with women’s restrooms is the limited number of stalls, typically ranging from 3 to 6, which leads to longer wait times. Art, however, maintains his stance that the delays are caused by socializing, particularly in front of mirrors, which he believes hinders the efficiency of restroom use. He asserts that this sociological difference between men and women is the root cause of the issue, not a lack of facilities.
Another topic brought up by a caller from Austin, Texas, is a potential law that would allow parents to be sued for their children’s actions. The caller speculates that this might lead to parents legally disowning their troubled children to avoid liability. Art acknowledges the complexity of this issue, suggesting that insurance companies might find a niche in offering coverage for such liabilities.
A caller shares a personal experience of encountering a young girl in a men’s restroom, which Art uses to highlight the potential for women to start using men’s restrooms due to facility shortages. He expresses concern about this trend, describing it as uncivilized and unsettling.
A caller from Roswell, New Mexico, discusses the practical aspects of women’s restroom usage, particularly the convenience of having another person to guard the door in places where locks are broken. This adds to the ongoing debate about restroom habits.
Art then addresses a call from Virginia regarding a tragic incident where a young man was shot and killed. The discussion turns to the prevalence of random acts of violence in modern America, with Art reflecting on the disturbing trend of murders committed by strangers.
A caller from the High Desert region talks about her favorite music record, shifting the tone to a lighter topic. This is followed by a discussion about why women go to the restroom in groups, with a listener suggesting it’s a Darwinian, pack instinct. Art humorously addresses the fear some men might have towards women, reflecting on gender dynamics.
The conversation returns to the Waco incident, with a caller questioning the ATF’s involvement in investigating child molestation and the alleged presence of a methamphetamine lab. Art expresses skepticism about these claims and criticizes the media’s handling of the hearings.
Finally, a caller from Woodside, California, offers a historical perspective on why women might go to the restroom together, linking it to an old-fashioned politeness where men would stand up to let women pass in crowded places like theaters.
A caller from Roswell, New Mexico, addresses the ongoing debate about women’s restroom habits. She suggests the practicality of having another person guard the door in poorly maintained facilities, providing a different perspective on why women might go to restrooms in pairs.
Art then delves into a more serious topic, discussing a listener’s theory about the Roswell pictures. The listener speculates that the images might be of a child exposed to radiation, linking it to government experiments on citizens. Art expresses skepticism about this theory, particularly regarding the notion that radiation could cause extra digits to grow.
A caller from Memphis, Tennessee, joins the conversation about women’s restroom habits, suggesting modesty as a reason for women going in groups. She argues that women might prefer someone to guard the door in case the lock is broken. Art, however, is not entirely convinced by this explanation, reiterating his belief that socializing is a significant factor.
The conversation takes an amusing turn when a caller admits to using men’s restrooms in emergencies, especially in bars or places with limited facilities. This leads to a broader discussion about restroom etiquette, including handwashing habits.
A caller from a lesbian bar offers a unique perspective, suggesting that women might go to restrooms in groups for safety reasons, particularly to avoid unwanted approaches. Art is intrigued but remains unsure whether this explanation fully addresses the question.
Art remains unconvinced by these explanations, suggesting that perhaps a formal study is needed to truly understand this behavior.
A caller from Phoenix apologizes for previously calling another guest a punk, leading to a brief discussion about the nature of the show’s guests and interactions. The same caller agrees with Art’s theory that women use restroom visits as an opportunity to talk about men.
The conversation then shifts to a caller expressing satisfaction with a refund he received from a company, highlighting their excellent customer service. Art praises the company’s business ethics and their focus on selling quality products.
A caller from Lodi, California, asks for advice on setting up an external antenna for a shortwave radio. Art helps troubleshoot the issue, suggesting that a poor connection might be to blame for the lack of reception improvement. The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a connection issue, with Art suggesting that a strand of the cable’s braid might be shorting to the center conductor. He advises the caller on how to properly string the antenna and ensure a correct connection.
The conversation then takes a lighter turn as Art discusses his interests in cats, marksmanship, and photography. The caller observes that many people who share these interests also tend not to join organizations, preferring to be non-joiners. Art agrees, sharing his own preference for independence and noting his membership in the NRA is solely for competition purposes.
a caller from Denver briefly touches on the topic of Newt Gingrich and his stance on the war on drugs. However, due to time constraints, the discussion is cut short.
Art Bell concludes the segment by announcing his plans to broadcast on the 75-meter band in about 10 minutes, providing an opportunity for listeners to tune in to his ham radio broadcast.